Duke University Hospital Duke Raleigh Hospital Duke Regional Hospital

Please select your clinical content

Adult Pediatric All

I. MIC Information

What is an MIC?

  • A Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent expressed in µg/mL which, under strictly controlled in vitro conditions, completely prevents visible growth of the test strain of an organism 

Why do MICs matter to me?

  • Adequate drug exposure is critical to ensuring positive patient outcomes
  • Drug exposure is directly impacted by the MIC
    • As the MIC rises, drug exposure decreases
  • Antibiotic resistance can be induced from inadequate drug exposure
    • Appropriate dosing of antimicrobials is key!

How are MICs determined?

  • Most of the MIC results we see in Epic come from automated testing methods
  • Some bug/drug combinations require manual MIC testing methods (Table 1)

Note: MIC variability can occur between susceptibility techniques 

How do I interpret MIC breakpoints?

How are breakpoints set?

  • Antimicrobial susceptibility standards are currently set by the FDA. The FDA typically refers to standards set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).  
    • The CLSI uses microbiologic data, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, and clinical studies to establish breakpoints.
    • Breakpoints may change over time as additional information becomes available.
  • The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100 is available online as a free resource and offers the most up-to-date information on breakpoints.

Questions? Contact ASET!

References:

  1. EUCAST Definitive Document. Methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Terminology. Clin Microbiol Infect 1998;4:291–296.
  2. Kowalska-Krochmal B, et al. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance. Pathogens 2021;10:165. doi:10.3390/ pathogens10020165.
  3. Giuliano C, et al. A Guide to Bacterial Culture Identification and Results Interpretation. P T 2019;44(4):192-200.
  4. Reller LB, et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009;49(11):1749–1755. https://doi.org/10.1086/647952.
  5. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST). USCAST - Home. Accessed February 26, 2024.
  6. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI eClipse Ultimate Access - Powered by Edaptive Technologies (edaptivedocs.net). Accessed February 26, 2024.
  7. American Society for Microbiology. Updating Breakpoints in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. https://asm.org/articles/2022/february/updating-breakpoints-in-antimicrobial-susceptibili. Updated December 13, 2023. Accessed February 26, 2024.
  8. Wenzler E, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: An updated primer for clinicians in the era of antimicrobial resistance: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 2023;43:264-278. doi:10.1002/phar.2781.
  9. Holmes NE, Turnidge JD, Munckhof WJ, et al. Antibiotic choice may not explain poorer outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(3):340-347.

 

II. Phoenix Susceptibility Testing Limitations (see attachment)

  • Limitation: Serratia marcescens, TMP-SMX not on/reliable from the panel
    • Solution: TMP-SMX will be set up simultaneously for all S. marcescens
  • Limitation: Proteus mirabilis, meropenem not on/reliable from the panel
    • Solution: If cefepime = SDD/R, set up/release meropenem Etest (results available next day)
  • Limitation: Proteus vulgaris/penneri, ampicillin-sulbactam not on/reliable from the panel
    • Solution: A comments to call the lab if this agent is clinically indicated will be added each time these organisms are isolated